Opportunity Review teardown
What an Opportunity Review shows before a proposal
A bottom-funnel proof page showing how Answered turns a website inspection into a plain-English owner action plan.
Data status
Anonymized sample pattern. Use it as the public proof structure until a real Opportunity Review can be published with client approval.
Context
The gap Answered is built to catch
A local business has traffic, reviews, and a working phone number, but the owner cannot tell which calls, forms, quotes, and reviews are producing real customers. The review looks for the operational gaps first, then recommends scope.
Review areas
5Findability, response, follow-up, reputation, owner visibility
First fixes
3-5The highest-leverage changes before a full scope
Scope fit
1 planAnswered recommends the smallest useful system
Before Answered
The website looks acceptable but the primary action changes section by section.
Forms ask for contact details but not urgency, service type, or location.
Reviews are strong but not requested on a schedule.
The owner has no simple weekly record of open opportunities.
After Answered
The first screen has one action and one response promise.
Forms collect the details needed for a faster callback.
Follow-up, review requests, and owner alerts are mapped before build work starts.
The proposal is tied to visible gaps, not a generic website package.
Operating record
What the owner can inspect
The system is useful because it creates a visible record. Each step has a timestamp, status, and next action instead of living as a forgotten call, vague form entry, or buried email.
Monday Brief
The weekly owner readout
The proof is not the automation itself. The proof is the owner seeing what happened, what is still open, and what needs a decision.